Review: IT – Stephen King
How does anyone even go about reviewing such a mammoth book as this? It is something I have been thinking about for a few days now. After much deliberation, I decided that much like George Denborough, I was just going to get dragged into it somehow…
I won’t give up my day job, I promise. I’ll just crack on with the review, shall I…?
It was the children who saw – and feel – what made the small town of Derry so horribly different. In the storm drains, in the sewers, IT lurks, taking on the shape of every nightmare, each one’s deepest dread.
Time passes and the children grow up, move away and forget. Until they are called back, once more to confront IT as it stirs and coils in the sullen depths of their memories, reaching up again to make their past nightmares a terrible present reality.
The year is 1985. The residents of Derry have lived in peace for the last 27 years. When IT awakes once more, the town slips into quiet unease. IT feeds off fear. Lurking in the shadows and manifesting as the beholders worst nightmare, it manipulates the wild imaginations of children, using it to terrorise and murder them.
After the death of his brother George in late 1957, Bill Denborough and his friends Beverly, Ben, Eddie, Mike, Stan and Richie unite against the monster in the sewers and somehow make it out alive. 27 years later, Mike Hanlon watches the death toll begin to rise once again and tries to reason against the truth. Eventually, he makes good his promise made all those years before: if IT came back, then he and his friends had to go back and kill IT for good.
If there is anyone out there who doesn’t know, this book is incredibly long. The edition I read was precisely 1,376 pages. Not only is this the longest book I have read ever, but I also managed to read it in just about two weeks! I was quite impressed I will admit. The next longest book I have read is War & Peace (which I also read this year). This is a few hundred pages shorter but still tops over a thousand. This also took me two weeks to read. Not bad going, in my book.
IT’s length is probably a turn-off for a lot of people, but I genuinely think that the length is necessary. I’d like to explain why.
A person’s way of thinking, their experience, history and relationship with fear is very personal. In order for the reader to get under the skin of each of the seven characters of this story, we had to learn an awful lot about them.
I absolutely agree that there is a lot of description and back story before we get to any real point of hair-raising action and from what I have read, some people aren’t so fond of that. I don’t think I could truly have invested into the characters without it.
That’s not to say I loved each and every one of the characters all the time; there were moments I liked and disliked them.
I loved Beverly when she fought and left her abusive husband to go to Derry and make good on her promise. That isn’t to say I understand why she would have tolerated that in the first place, exactly. Well, I do; she says as much herself that she married her father (not literally, but her father was violent towards her child-self). I’m saying, having blessedly not grown up with that, I don’t understand because I would never tolerate that behaviour towards me. Just a word of warning, lads.
“You pay for what you get, you own what you pay for… and sooner or later whatever you own comes back home to you.”
IT – Stephen King
I cannot praise this book highly enough for the way it was written. King really does know how to draw you in as a reader. It is his realistic portrayal of characters that I love best about his writing.The perspective of the book frequently changes between time periods, especially so at the end, but manages to achieve this seamlessly.
Naturally, each of the characters has changed dramatically during a quarter of a century, but the consistency of the character’s mindset and attitudes to the respective timeframe (and to their background) is spot on.
The timeline of events for each “period” is also frequently discussed and this also seemingly consistent.
I have already mentioned the manner in which the book splits between the time periods of 1958 and 1985. One of the effective techniques King uses to maintain suspense is by slowly unveiling the events of the first encounter in 1958 by having trigger events in 1985 prompt each character to recover memories of IT.
It is entirely possible, when an individual experiences a traumatic event, for the mind to repress these memories as a coping strategy.
Therefore, not only does each of these small revelations keep the reader engaged with the story, but it also has a psychological foundation.
As events unfold in 1985 we simultaneously re-live the first encounter with IT. Whilst we have glimpses of the end of their troubles in 1958, we only learn the detail of their duel with the devil at the same time as when they go back that second (and hopefully last) time. The last few hundred pages flew for me. I also have no nails left. Literally.
I’m going to be honest and say that I didn’t find the book “scary”. Of course, it is unpleasant to read about children being murdered and vulnerable people being manipulated into committing heinous acts. What I am saying is this, I didn’t lose any sleep from reading it. The majority of fears experienced and again re-lived as adults are the fears of children – the dark, clowns, werewolves and the school bully, for instance. Whilst the book absolutely lives up to the genre of horror, I wasn’t uncomfortable reading it.
Despite the genre of the book, I found it had some lovely, positive notes that could be taken away from it; for example, the power of friendship. Here is one of my favourite quotes by way of an example:-
“Maybe there aren’t any such things as good friends or bad friends – maybe there are just friends, people who stand by you when you’re hurt and who help you feel not so lonely. Maybe they’re always worth being scared for, and hoping for, and living for. Maybe worth dying for too, if that’s what has to be. No good friends. No bad friends. Only people you want, need to be with; people who build their houses in your heart.”
IT – Stephen King
Emotions like fear, anguish, anger and despair are what makes us human. But what also make us human is our ability to hope, to dream and to believe.
Would you rather live having never experienced emotion?
I say give me the good, the bad and the ugly – after all, they say that it is better to have loved and lost, than never to have loved at all.
10 thoughts on “Review: IT – Stephen King”
I’ll have to go find my big-girl panties for this one because I’m simply a pussy when it comes to creepy things. But! I did buy this monster of a book because I do really want to read it someday, haha.
As for ” I absolutely agree that there is a lot of description and back story before we get to any real point of hair-raising action..”, that’s one thing I simply love about Stephen King’s writing. It’s elaborate, descriptive and yet it still has a way of sucking you right in. At times you don’t even realize that the story itself isn’t really progressing, simply because you keep getting new information.
I love the way he writes!
A absolutely agree!! I love it too! For me, it’s getting to know the characters inside out that makes you really invest into them. Then, as the action unfolds, you cannot help but want the best for them! Thanks for your comments!! 😊
Yup, the sheer length has put me off – sure it might be amazing but also I could read six other books in that time?
Fab review, but I’m still not sure it’d be my cup of tea.
Cora ❤ http://www.teapartyprincess.co.uk/
I’m not surprised – they weren’t kidding when they declared it an epic on the spine!!
Each to their own – we all have our own tastes!
Thanks for the lovely comment 😊
Great review! I’m glad to know it’s not a scary read because I know this author likes to write horrors. What you describe here is unpleasant to read but this book must be great because there’s a movie on it. Yes, the length has put me off too hehe..
I find the more unnerving thing about Stephen King’s writing (note: not scary, but unnerving) is how realistic his characters are. I think it’s all too easy to write altruistic characters that have desirable traits – but that’s not true to life. King isn’t afraid to portray the harsh realism of life and put it into the spotlight. For example, why some people may be prone to violence, abuse, addiction etc are all included. It’s that for me that draws me to his writing.
I particularly relate to Ben, and even his mother. Ben uses food as an emotional crutch, is massively overweight and spends his childhood being bullied for it. Ben’s Mum knows she over feeds him, but does so because to her, that is her way of proving to herself that she is managing to provide for Ben well despite doing so single-handedly.
Nobody can deny that King really develops his characters well.
Are all of his books written in this way? With characters so real & relatable? Thanks for the glimpse into this book. I will make time to read it. I also think when I see skinny kids I thought parents don’t spend time to feed them so in this case the mom proved to me that she spent a lot of time feeding Ben 😊
I’ve only read a few King books so far, but in my experience yes! Pet Sematary is also very good with its characters